Bike (all) dyno figures

[tazkenny]

Came across this tonight....

http://www.factorypro.com/dyno/true1.html

[SIX36]

.....

[Mr.Ed]

I can see it just fine...
If that's correct:
Amazing to see a GSXR750 06 (cams and porting) making 132hp and a Desmo 162hp!:lmao:
But then again, I wonder how narrow the power band is on that gixxer...
Oh! and no 600RR????:cursing::cursing:

[Birdman45]

That site is a complete load of shit, based on OLD 150 model dyno's, take it with a grain of salt. I have had some monster arguments with the guy that runs that site, and he's a knob. I mean, nobody is gonna say "look, I made a dyno and it's rubbish", so they have to go after the industry standard, but again, much of what is said on there is based on the first non eddy current dyno's dynojet first came out with.......... and as you noticed, (and my argument to him) was that if Dynojet h.p is SO OVER STATED, then how come his dyno figures, and anyones with that or a dyno dynamics (works the same way basically) dyno always have higher numbers than my "over the top" dynojet model. He just starts another argument on something else.

[Turtle]

That site is a complete load of shit, based on OLD 150 model dyno's, take it with a grain of salt. I have had some monster arguments with the guy that runs that site, and he's a knob. I mean, nobody is gonna say "look, I made a dyno and it's rubbish", so they have to go after the industry standard, but again, much of what is said on there is based on the first non eddy current dyno's dynojet first came out with.......... and as you noticed, (and my argument to him) was that if Dynojet h.p is SO OVER STATED, then how come his dyno figures, and anyones with that or a dyno dynamics (works the same way basically) dyno always have higher numbers than my "over the top" dynojet model. He just starts another argument on something else.

You tell 'em Trev...........and this time don't "Hold-Back".....

[rats666]

:confused1: :crazysmiley: drugs are bad mmm k

[muzz]

id say most dynos would read different wouldnt they ?(correct me if im wrong birdman)
at the end of the day they are a tuning tool for comparing mods before and after

[SLAC]

That site is a complete load of shit, based on OLD 150 model dyno's, take it with a grain of salt. I have had some monster arguments with the guy that runs that site, and he's a knob. I mean, nobody is gonna say "look, I made a dyno and it's rubbish", so they have to go after the industry standard, but again, much of what is said on there is based on the first non eddy current dyno's dynojet first came out with.......... and as you noticed, (and my argument to him) was that if Dynojet h.p is SO OVER STATED, then how come his dyno figures, and anyones with that or a dyno dynamics (works the same way basically) dyno always have higher numbers than my "over the top" dynojet model. He just starts another argument on something else.

Yeah thats right, my TLR has at least 160hp at the rear wheel....:ticketgrumblesmile:

[Birdman45]

Dyno's do read differently, but what he is saying is that dynojet dyno's give inflated numbers coz they don't have an eddy current brake on them and blah blah blah, well, mine f'kin does so he's full of shit. IN the scheme of things, it doesn't matter a flying fuk what the h.p figure is anyway, but yeah, like I said, many a netfight with that tool. What he doesn't tell you is on his and dyno dynamics dyno's, you can edit things in parameters and give an 8h.p gain on a chart by doing nothing to the bike. I've seen numbers from S&R that you just shake your head at and I've been told by a few people that used to go there how they do it. But don't worry about that, just remember, dynojet dyno's read high. LOL Again, funny how most people that come to me after being elsewhere ask why their bike made 5-10 more on another dyno (Before I touched it before you smart arses wade in. hahaha).

[Alex.]

So Trev, can we get 250hp at the rear wheel with my Blade?
:lmao::lmao::lmao:

[Birdman45]

hahaha Not on my dyno, but S&R might get ya there.